Uma alternativa de efetividade da prestação jurisdicional nas ações assistenciais e previdenciárias a partir das regras de competência da lei 10.259/2001 ante o surgimento de novas provas

Abstract

This present work proposes – if the demonstrate how the seal of one jurisdictional instrument- rescission action- at the Federal Special Courts, limit the access to justice and prevent the concession a assistance or pension fundamental human right, to people in real equality of right, that by the rules of competence and court procedure, has restrictions to a fair material right. The right to a assistance and pension installment has the unavailable nature and the absolute immutability of the decision given by the special court must mainly be analyzed according one perspective brought by the Federal Constitution, in front of human rights, especially, when the instrument of rescission, it is with a new document, that by itself ensures one favorable decision. In other words, the social rights would be denied, not by the fundamentals of a fair decision, but the unequal procedural instrument. So it is necessary to impose a criterion that is flexible and/or modification of the rule, by the exception terms, by direct affront to the principle of effectiveness of justice and the human dignity. As a search method, it used the hypothetical-deductive method, with problems formulation, presenting the solution e falsification tests, to after this phases obtain knowledge about the investigated question, using as search techniques bibliography, qualitative and exploratory documents. As provision guarantee of a democratic and social state of law, the material right founded on human social right, that represents the state essentials principles goals, must pass for a wide legal process, with all tactics and resources that make sure the fundamental human material right is fair.